2006 Women’s Summit
Posted Tuesday, August 22, 2006 by Tom Wilson

Dear Friends,


Please take note of the following very important meeting. Please pass this information on to all you feel would benefit. Regards


Tom Wilson, Incorporator
Michigan Gender Equity Team (M GET)
4045-23rd Street
Wyandotte, Michigan 48192-6902
313-235-2168 (work)
http://www.mi-gender-equity.com/


The 2006 Women’s Summit: What’s At Stake for Michigan Families will be held Friday, September 15 in Southfield, Grand Rapids, Lansing, Flint, and Marquette. Register with the attached form or at www.oneunitedmichigan.org. The Women’s Summit will be a call to action about issues of importance to Michigan women’s health care, economic status, and educational opportunities. Organizing for the campaign to defeat Proposal 2 will be an important part of the Summit this year. Don’t miss this important opportunity to connect with other people committed to saving affirmative action in Michigan.



Mary Pollock

Same Gender Class for Boys in Reading
Posted Wednesday, June 14, 2006 by Tom Wilson

Dear Friends,


I know there are some pilot same gender schools and classes in Michigan, although they can't legally exclude the other gender. Does anyone have examples in Michigan of programs targeting same gender general education classes for boys in K-12, that helps them with topics such as reading, where boys typically need more support than girls? Please respond to me if you know of any?


Tom Wilson, Incorporator
Michigan Gender Equity Team (M GET)
4045-23rd Street
Wyandotte, Michigan 48192-6902
313-235-2168 (work) http://www.mi-gender-equity.com/

Same Sex Class
Posted Tuesday, June 13, 2006 by Tom Wilson

Dear Friends,


At her request, please provide input to our friend Liz Homer, with your views of the same sex class and school issue.


Tom Wilson, Incorporator
Michigan Gender Equity Team (M GET)
4045-23rd Street
Wyandotte, Michigan 48192-6902
313-235-2168 (work) http://www.mi-gender-equity.com/




I (lizhomer@sbcglobal.net ) would like to hear from everyone about this. What are we going to do about it? Are we going to be so concerned about affirmative action that we let sex segregation blossom?

Remember, there is not one learning problem characteristic of one sex only.Remember. we have two good examples of sex segregation in the schools - vocational education and athletics and it is a constant battle to provide equitable programs - and we don't. Do you care about sex segregation? Do you buy the proponents arguments?

So how are we going to deal with this? EVERYBODY, should give their opinion on this.

Let's hear from you.
Liz (Homer)

Women's Values Research Project
Posted Tuesday, June 13, 2006 by Tom Wilson

Dear Friends,


Please consider another important question by our friend Liz Homer. Regards.


Tom Wilson, Incorporator
Michigan Gender Equity Team (M GET)
4045-23rd Street
Wyandotte, Michigan 48192-6902
313-235-2168 (work) http://www.mi-gender-equity.com/


Remember when Tom sent us the information on the Women's Values Research Project? Here is the link to the Women's Vision Project. I (lizhomer@sbcglobal.net ) listened to the audio link on the website, which spells out their plan - they sound very young - hurray.

http://www.iwpr.org/Politics_Religion_PublicVision/home.htm
It is religious based, and we sure do need to be more influencial in religion and to activate religious groups in support of feminism.

It seems they have concluded that women need assertiveness and encouragement to be more influencial. After you see what they are up to, is this what you would have anticipated? I think it would help if more people were aware of this, so pass the info along, please.

Liz


----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 6:44 PM
Subject: How might women's values change the world?


Help us answer these questions on May 15 and 18.


You're invited to participate in a unique and exciting event! Using new
and emerging technology, the Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR) is holding an unprecedented online convening of women, where we will write a statement on women's vision for public life--and how we might live it out in policymaking and practice.

The event is sponsored by IWPR's project on Politics, Religion, and Women's Public Vision, which is raising the visibility of women's values for public life and building networks among women in religious movements for social justice and women's movement organizing. By participating, you will help us develop a statement and policy agenda that seeks to advance women's values in American public life.

There are two opportunities to participate:

May 15, 2006, 4 pm to 6 pm EST (East Coast time)
May 18, 2006, 4 pm to 6 pm PST (West Coast time)

Please register by Wednesday, May 10th.

The event will use a new online collaborative writing software (Synanim) available through Faith Voices for the Common Good. Synanim is a unique online process that enables participants to contribute as individuals but to share interactively. Information on the process is available at www.syanim.org .

After the event, you will receive a copy of the statement. It will be used to help us develop a policy agenda based on women's values. We will keep you apprised of future events and publications incorporating the statement. We are also planning to provide additional opportunities for participants to interact.

To participate, please register by clicking here. You will be prompted to indicate which day you will take part. Prior to the writing session you will receive an email from Synanim ( help@synanim.com ) with a web link and your login and password information.

Questions? For information about the technology, email Brian Sarrazin at brian@faithvoices.org . For information at IWPR's work on women's public vision, email Erica Williams at williams@iwpr.org .

We hope you'll join us!

Michigan Women Speak on Affirmative Action
Posted Tuesday, June 13, 2006 by Tom Wilson

Dear Friends,


Please note the following information from Sue Rumph of Michigan NOW.


Tom Wilson, Incorporator
Michigan Gender Equity Team (M GET)
4045-23rd Street
Wyandotte, Michigan 48192-6902
313-235-2168 (work) http://www.mi-gender-equity.com/


It is imperative to vote NO! on MCRI Nov. 7, 2006 and tell everyone you know.

Michigan Women Speak on Affirmative Action

Michigan Women Speak on Affirmative Action is a project seeking to bring women’s stories to the forefront. This project will showcase real stories from women who speak on how they have benefited from affirmative action and why it is still needed.

Post your story at womenspeak@oneunitedmichigan.org

Together we can defeat this constitutional amendment!

2005 Michigan Women's Leadership Index
Posted Monday, October 31, 2005 by Tom Wilson

Dear Friends,


As described below, Terry Barclay has provided a pdf of the 2005 Michigan Women's Leadership Index. If you would like me to e-mail you this pdf as an e-mail attachment, please write me at wybearfan1@aol.com. Regards


Tom Wilson, Incorporator
Michigan Gender Equity Team (M GET)
4045-23rd Street
Wyandotte, MI 48192-6902
313-235-2168 (work) http://mi-gender-equity.com/


I thought you might like to receive a pdf of the 2005 Michigan Women's Leadership Index, which was released by Inforum one week ago on Monday. Feel free to distribute to others who might be interested. Hard copy versions are available from our office and can be ordered online at our website, www.inforummichigan.org.

I just wish the news were better!

Terry


Terry A. Barclay

President and CEO

Inforum (formerly the Women's Economic Club)

Inforum Center for Leadership (formerly the Women's Leadership Forum)




Orchestra Place, 3663 Woodward Ave., Suite 4-1610

Detroit, MI 48201-2403

313.578.3230 fax 313.578.3245

tbarclay@inforummichigan.org

website: www.inforummichigan.org

Status of Michigan Women By County
Posted Monday, July 25, 2005 by Tom Wilson

Dear Friends,


You may want to review and pass on the important information below.


Tom Wilson, Incorporator
Michigan Gender Equity Team (M GET)
4045-23rd Street
Wyandotte, MI 48192-6902
313-235-2168 (work) http://mi-gender-equity.com/



Status of Michigan Women By County
The Status of Michigan Women at the County level (http://www.michigan.gov/mdcr/0,1607,7-138-4957---,00.html) has been prepared by the Michigan Women's Commission and the James A & Faith Knight Foundation in June 2005. This information creates a county-level report of the status of women in Michigan using much of the same categories as used by the Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR) reports on the Status of Women in the States and the Status of Women in Michigan (www.iwpr.org ). We hope people will use this information to improve the quality of life for Michigan's women.

(Michigan) Pay Equity Network (PEN)
Posted Sunday, April 17, 2005 by Tom Wilson

Friends,


Consider a membership in the (Michigan) Pay Equity Network (PEN). The PEN of Michigan, was formed in 1985 to study pay inequities among classifications of state employees. When the goal than, was not achieved, labor, women's and civil rights groups continued to try to eliminate sex and race based wage discrimination. PEN of Michigan has declared September 24, PAY-InEquity DAY, the day on which men have been paid as much in a part of the year in Michigan, as women will receive, working for the whole year. Women in Michigan earn $.67 for every dollar the men earn. Michigan is next to the worst in the nation. After PEN of Michigan had been in place, the National Committee on Pay Equity was formed and also created a Pay Equity day, on a Tuesday in April, to speak to these same shortcoming (see http://www.wageproject.org). The timing of the national day relates to how many more months and days into the next year a woman must work to earn (a 15 month, some number of days, year for women) the same as a man does in a 12 month year. To join PEN of Michigan in the work to end the extreme pay discrimination in Michigan, call 313-562-6924 or e-mail PollyHowe@juno.com .

"Challenge Day"
Posted Saturday, October 9, 2004 by Tom Wilson

Dear Friends,

I recently learned about Challenge Day. "Challenge Day" (http://www.challengeday.org), a California non-profit organization, and its Michigan team (http://www.challengemidwest.org) describe themselves as being committed to stopping teen violence and alienation. Their award-winning programs are designed to tear down the walls of separation, inspiring participants to live, study and work in an environment of compassion, acceptance and respect.

Challenge Day provides youth and their communities with experiential workshops and programs hosted in schools and church's, that demonstrate the possibility of love and connection through the celebration of diversity, truth and full expression. I have heard remarkable positive feedback from youth who have attended their events at their school.

Challenge Day fits in as a tool for our gender equality advocacy. If we ever expect to achieve equality and full respect between the genders, we need solutions that will help end the violence against women, increase self-esteem and end gender based limitations to women and men. The Michigan Gender Equity Team (MGET) is devoted to actions that help make sure MEN and WOMEN receive equal treatment, by providing information, resources and sponsoring projects that can help.

I feel that by encouraging Michigan parents and educators to sponsor a Challenge Day at their school or church, we have an important tool to help our youth change these old patterns and so I do encourage this. Challenge Day and the encouraged follow-up projects, are meant to help our youth explore deeply their own experience of stereotyping, gender separation and other forms of social oppression and release the emotional blocks created by those experiences.

The Challenge Day program reports receiving numerous awards from the Juvenile Justice System, the D.A.R.E. Officers Association, government officials, and many school districts and cities nationwide. The Challenge Day program has been featured in the New York Times best seller, Chicken Soup for the Teenage Soul.

Challenge Day has proven to be valuable to Michigan students. So that you can learn about Michigan students who have gained from Challenge Day, you may wish to talk with Metropolitan Detroit school leaders who have benefited by the experience;
· Jerry Davisson, Assistant principal, Chippewa Valley High School, (586) 723-2314 jdavisson@cvs.k12.mi.us
· Greg Greene, principal, Clintondale High School (586) 791-6300 GG2mcln@ccs.mi.sd.net
· Harry Hayward, Ann Arbor Pioneer High School, Program Facilitator/Interventionist (734) 891-7046 hayward@aaps.k12.mi.us

Locally, Mary Myers, , 248-545-9080, MaryMy@aol.com can tell you more. A couple upcoming events are below.
October 16 at University Preparatory High School, Detroit & October 17, Berkley High School, Berkley.

Important Brain and Chemical Differences Between Boys and Girls
Posted Thursday, January 22, 2004 by Tom Wilson

According to Michael Gurian, Ph.D. (http://www.Michael-Gurian.com), in his book “The Wonder of Boys”, there are important brain and chemical differences between boys and girls. The following excerpts from Dr. Gurians book are meant to highlight findings that make the case that when people wonder why boys and men are as they are, do as they do, some of the answer has to do with biological issues pre-determined at birth. Pointing these biological explanations out is not meant as an excuse, but is meant as a plea that we should take under performing areas of both boys and girls into account and create strategies to lift up these areas to the benefit of all. Pointing out some areas where boys are challenged does not mean that boys are underserved in all areas. At the same time we consider possible biological realities for boys, we need to exert more control over the social factors that lead to many of the behavioral gender differences we see. We need to remember that the social expectations that parents and teacher’s set continue to be extremely impactful too.

*During fetal life when the brain and nervous system are being organized, the female cortex (brain) develops in advance of the male cortex. The left half of the cortex (the part of the brain that controls thinking) develops somewhat later than the right (the part that works with spatial relationships). In males, though, there is an even greater lag. As a result, one neurologist says, when the right side is ready to hook up with the left side (by sending over connecting nerve fibers), in the male the appropriate cells don’t yet exist on the left. So (the fibers) go back and instead form connections within the right hemisphere. One of the results of this structural difference is increased focus in the male brain on spatial relationships and activity.

*The female cortex develops faster than the males and because of this it is able to create the larger corpus callosum and because that bundle of nerves is larger, it is more able to enjoy more cross talk between the left and right hemispheres. One reason boys do less well in reading is due to their smaller corpus callosum.
a. Is this a contributor to boys consistently being less proficient than girls in MEAP writing scores?

*The brain that will read better is the brain that can draw more heavily on both sides of the brain at once, as girls can do. The smaller corpus callosum in boys is also one of the reasons boys find it more difficult to identify with accuracy the emotions on another person’s face.
a. Is this a contributor keeping boys/men from making more consistent emotional relationship connections with girls/women?

*If we could look even deeper into the brain, we would identify a neurotransmitter, serotonin, which inhibits aggressive behavior, and which exists in higher levels in girls than boys. Serotonin works with hormones secreted in the hypothalamus of the brain, hormones like testosterone. A boy’s brain secretes more testosterone than a girl’s and transmits less serotonin. Boys become all the more aggressive, girls less aggressive.
a. Is this a contributor to Michigan school discipline interventions that lead to expulsion being 3 to 1 males?
b. Is this a contributor to more boys (159,953 boys and 78,394 girls in 2002) in Michigan being identified as requiring special education?

*Rubin Gur at the University of Pennsylvania noticed structural differences in the way girls and boys use their left and right hemispheres. Gur has shown through his process how the male brain is not set up to be verbal but the female brain is.

*Overall brain research has shown how the female brain is at work in more sections than the male just about all of the time. It is on call in a way the male is not. In a way, the male brain turns on to do its task, and then turn off.

*Girls complain that boys don’t listen, women complain that men don’t hear, people don’t feel heard by boys and men. Males in general hear in one ear better than in the other. Females in general hear more data and hear equally well in both ears.

I take the above findings to mean that even though reading and MEAP tested writing skills, are important to both boys and girls, it is especially important that educators and parents help boys make up for the skill deficit that boys generally start with. It appears boys need extra early work to get them to a point where they can proceed forward on an equal footing with girls in certain areas. If boys don’t get this extra help and are allowed to stay and fall further behind girls, we will continue to experience many of the same and more, negative societal, personal and relationship consequences we currently see.

Critical Unequal School Service Indicators
Posted Saturday, November 15, 2003 by Tom Wilson

Critical Unequal Service Indicators

Michigan’s schools many times create a climate that tolerates and encourages gender-biased behavior and results.
 Girls receive dramatically less support in sports, some examples;
1. It is only girls, who suffer the burden of having sports being scheduled out of season,
2. Boys routinely receive cheerleader and pep band support. Girls rarely do,
3. Boys regularly play on one school night and a prime time night, while girls play on two school nights and rarely play on a prime time night,
4. Even with male sports receiving the vast majority of financial and in-kind support by boosters, schools take next to no action to balance booster or other support between boys and girls, etc.
 Girls are not encouraged or supported enough to consider the many career areas that are nontraditional for them, some examples;
1. There are 20 career clusters out of 400 the Labor Department identifies as nontraditional to girls, while there are barely two nontraditional to boys
2. Women account for 19% of the enrollments in Trade & Industry, up from 14% in 1978, not a great deal of change for a 30-year mandate under Title IX.
3. While many people are at least somewhat aware of the low participation of women in IT careers, few realize that both the percentage and total number of bachelor's degrees awarded in Computer Science to women decreased almost every year over the last decade. This is in direct contrast to almost every other area of science and engineering where participation by women has significantly increased. Only 14.4% of employees in IT are female (Myers, 1999); and that there was only a 2% increase in the number of women in high-tech fields between 1991-1996 (Myers, 1999).
The current percentage of Computer Science B.Sc. graduates from U.S. research-intensive universities (i.e. those offering a Ph.D. in Computer Science) is approximately 17%.
4. Schools are not helping much at all to break the pattern of large numbers of girls being overtly steered because of historic gendered career patterns, into low paying jobs, traditional to women, even though 90% of girls will become the sole support for themselves –family in their lifetime. This results in 37.5% of female head of households with children living in poverty.
 Dr. James Nuttall of MDOE reports that more boys (159,953 in 2002) than girls (78,394 in 2002) are identified as requiring special education services. To some people, this may mean girls are under identified. It may mean that boys are over identified. Boys may be over identified in part because it is hard to tolerate the more aggressive nature of immature boys. Helping boys to be more controlled and communicative may be a better approach.
 We continue to allow boys to under perform in language arts, as compared to girls, we continue a pattern where many more boys then girls are less able to effectively empathize or communicate.

In the MEAP essential skills for writing,

1. The differential between the percentage of males (48) being proficient writers, and females (63) in 2002, was 15% in the 5th grade statewide,
2. The differential between the percentage of male’s (57) being proficient writers, and females (75) in 2002, was 18% in the 7th grade statewide, and there were traditional similar repeated differentials, in every preceding year.
3. In the statewide class of 2001 (11th grade) MEAP Writing results, 33% of the students in level 1 (the highest level) were males (67% females), a spread of 34% in favor of successful writing skills being dominated by females, 42% in level 2 were males (58% females), 56% in level 3 were males (44% females) and 67% in level 4 (the lowest level) were males (33% females).

The MEAP scoring guide for writing indicates that submissions receive low scores when they have little focus or lack central ideas, where organization of thought is lacking and where a lack of vocabulary interferes with understanding. The downside for boys is that neither our modern day interpersonal relationships nor the demands of an increasingly complex workplace, will tolerate a lack of understanding of information, a lack of sufficient vocabulary to communicate information or a lack of being able to retain and relate information.

In terms of school discipline intervention leading to expulsion, the 2001-2002 State School Safety Practices Report, indicated there were 1,525 total expulsions (assaults/350, drugs/304, weapons/250, other behavior/157 and verbal/107), which was 1/10th of 1% of the total school population, 1/4 of the total expulsions in the 9th grade, expulsions were 3 to 1 males, males were more likely expelled for violence and girls more likely expelled for drugs. Is it reasonable to believe that some of the male violence became an option to communicate a message that many boys were not taught to deliver in a more acceptable way? Would it make better use of resources to provide the extra support to boys early, to overcome the serious under performance of boys in writing, to create classrooms and hall environments where bullying is not allowed early, as a way to eliminate a large part of future discipline impacts?

In our secondary school classrooms, the pattern for boys is they are expected to shout-out, while girls are expected to wait their turn. Boys see they are heard, girls sometimes feel they are not seen.

Because of situations like these, many Michigan children still are being limited to historic gender stereotyped roles and many of them continue to receive unequal support by our schools. If you have ideas on how to change this or want to help, please "contact us".

MGET, our contacts and their activities
Posted Sunday, September 30, 2001 by Tom Wilson

I would like to introduce you to a coalition I am involved with, the Michigan Gender Equity Team (MGET). The Michigan Gender Equity Team is a group of organizations acting as a catalyst to achieve gender equity in Michigan's schools. Gender equity means an equal chance at learning for females and males, with open options to learn subjects and prepare for future education, jobs, and careers without expectations based on gender. Equal encouragement for both genders to develop, achieve, and learn is essential to equitable treatment of female and male students. Please visit our web site.

I have talked to representatives of the following groups and to the following individuals, who have stated their interests in having a level playing field for women and men. Some are more active then others. I am in regular communication with many of the groups and people, in the Downriver area, the Detroit area, as well as at the State level, to help people and groups establish networks with each other and to explore mutual action ideas. These ideas are moving forward and are making a difference.

In spite of the hard work by many individuals in and out of very supportive organizations, such as above, we still have a shocking current situation for families, women and children.

*Some 70 percent of people in abject poverty (living on less than $1 per day) are women(UNIFEM - 1995)(Found at ). Women constitute over 70 per cent of the one third of the world's population living in absolute poverty, and their numbers are growing. Found in Report on the activities of the U.N. Development Fund for Women, 1995 Under II. Programme B (economics empowerment programme at ). Many of these women are raising children by themselves without adequate resources, and

*According to the US Department of Justice, intimate partners commit
937,490 violent crimes against women and 144,620 against men annually
(Callie Marie Rennison & Sarah Welchans, U.S. Department of Justice,
Intimate Partner Violence 8 {May 2000}). This violence doesn’t just affect the women involved, but it also affects the children they generally raise alone.

Even though both men and women should be supported, these disproportionate realities should not be tolerated. It seems clear to me that day to day efforts must continue, to support and help girls and women hold their own and make some positive progress in safely living satisfying lives day to day. It is also clear to me that because of the 2 statistics I quoted, these realities will not change much, without the power and influence gained by the listed groups and others, focusing their efforts by mutually joining together in a few mutually supported projects. There are ongoing
efforts to talk together on how to find increasingly effective acts of
mutuality.

I would like you to know the importance MGET gives to equal treatment in Michigan schools.

I very much hope we can communicate about how you can be involved in this very important work and how our efforts can support your efforts.

Sincerely,


Tom Wilson, MGET Initiator
(313) 235-2168 (work)
(734) 283-5482 (home)
tomwilson@mi-gender-equity.com

Here is the bulk of the representative list of contacts I maintain:

Michigan
1. BASF Business Women's Group,
2. Center of the Education of Women (U of M),
3. Coalition Advancing Women's Self-Sufficiency (CAWSS),
4. Communities For Equity (CFE),
5. Downriver Guidance Clinic,
6. Downriver Women's Resource Center (not in business),
7. Female Alumni Athletic Boosters,
8. Girls Empowered,
9. Henry Ford Community College Focus on Women Office,
10. Metropolitan Council of the Girl Scouts,
11. Michigan AAUW (American Association of University Women,
12. Michigan ACLU,
13. Michigan Anti-Defamation League,
14. Michigan Association of Junior Leagues,
15. Michigan, Michigan Association of School Boards (MASB),
16. Michigan Business & Professional Women Foundation,
17. Michigan Center for Career and Technical Education,
18. Michigan Coalition for Staff Development, School Improvement,
19. Michigan Education Association (MEA),
20. Michigan Federation of Teachers (MFT),
21. Michigan Jewish Conference,
22. Michigan League of Women Voters,
23. Michigan branch of the National Council for Research on Women (NCRW) at the Institute for Research on Women and Gender (IRWG) at U of M's Center for the Education of Women,
24. Michigan NOW (National Organization for Women),
25. Michigan Parent Teachers Association (M-PTA),
26. Michigan Women's Assembly,
27. Michigan Women's Foundation (MWF),
28. Nokomis Foundation,
29. Soroptomists International,
30. Venture Club (pre-Soroptomists),
31. Wayne County RESA,
32. Women's Economic Club,
33. Women Matter,
34. Young Women for Change (Grand Rapids & Grosse Pointe),
35. Zonta,

Outside Michigan
1. Central States (Baha'i) Committee for the Advancement of the Equality of Women and Men,
2. (U of M Programs for Educational Opportunity in the) Federal Title IV Equity Assistance Center for the Great Lakes States (IL, IN, MI, MN, OH and WI),
3. National Council of Jewish Women,
4. Women Sports Foundation (New York),

Individuals Interested
Donna Dennis, Southgate Schools, Sharon Diotte RN, also instructor at HFCC on women peace of mind, Ann Hatley, , Jo Jacobs former Director of Michigan DOE Title IX Compliance Office, Carole Lapidos, consultant, Raising Strong and Confident Daughters, Judy O'Dette, Jefferson High School, Dir. Car. & Tech. Education, Wayne County Community College District Western Campus Office, Lynda J. Naylor, Director of the Women's Resource Center, Oakland County RESA Marlana Krolicki, Consultant.